Make your own free website on Tripod.com

mamsha.com

Debate Criteria
Home
Essay Criteria
Mangrove Planting Important Documents
Debate Criteria
Powerpoint Criteria
Kapayapaan
KABATAAN
Tayutay
Tanging Pamana
Halimbawa ng Silabus (Syllabus)
Pang - Uri (Kayarian at Kaantasan)
Pagpapalwawak ng pangungusap
Iba't Ibang Pagpapahayag
Paglalarawan
Paglalahad
Pangangatwiran
Talumpati
Noli Me Tangere
Pangungusap at kayarian
Pang-abay
Ponemang Suprasegmental
Pagbabagong Morpoponemiko
Tungkol kay mamsha
Favorite Links
Tawagan ako
Pamilya ko
Vacation Photo Album
Pangatnig
Pang - uri
Wastong Gamit ng Salita

Enter subhead content here

Debate Rubrics

An evaluation tool for student debates.

Team Name and Position ________________________________________________
1 = weak 2 = developing 3 = adequate 4 = above average 5 = strong
1. Appearance of the team
1 2 3 4 5
2. Opening statements were clear and addressed the central issues of the debate.
1 2 3 4 5
3. Overall impression of the presentation – eye contact, use of voice
1 2 3 4 5
4. Claims show evidence of research.
1 2 3 4 5
5. Rebuttal statements effectively addressed the statements of the opposing team.
1 2 3 4 5
6. The presentation demonstrated organization and forethought.
1 2 3 4 5
7. Final statements effectively summarized salient points and improved the team’s
position.
1 2 3 4 5
8. Participants adhered to rules and procedures.
1 2 3 4 5
Total /40
Winning Team – Affirmative Negative
Additional Comments
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Enter supporting content here