mamsha.com

Debate Criteria
Home
Essay Criteria
Mangrove Planting Important Documents
Debate Criteria
Powerpoint Criteria
Kapayapaan
KABATAAN
Tayutay
Tanging Pamana
Halimbawa ng Silabus (Syllabus)
Pang - Uri (Kayarian at Kaantasan)
Pagpapalwawak ng pangungusap
Iba't Ibang Pagpapahayag
Paglalarawan
Paglalahad
Pangangatwiran
Talumpati
Noli Me Tangere
Pangungusap at kayarian
Pang-abay
Ponemang Suprasegmental
Pagbabagong Morpoponemiko
Tungkol kay mamsha
Favorite Links
Tawagan ako
Pamilya ko
Vacation Photo Album
Pangatnig
Pang - uri
Wastong Gamit ng Salita

Enter subhead content here

Debate Rubrics

An evaluation tool for student debates.

Team Name and Position ________________________________________________
1 = weak 2 = developing 3 = adequate 4 = above average 5 = strong
1. Appearance of the team
1 2 3 4 5
2. Opening statements were clear and addressed the central issues of the debate.
1 2 3 4 5
3. Overall impression of the presentation – eye contact, use of voice
1 2 3 4 5
4. Claims show evidence of research.
1 2 3 4 5
5. Rebuttal statements effectively addressed the statements of the opposing team.
1 2 3 4 5
6. The presentation demonstrated organization and forethought.
1 2 3 4 5
7. Final statements effectively summarized salient points and improved the team’s
position.
1 2 3 4 5
8. Participants adhered to rules and procedures.
1 2 3 4 5
Total /40
Winning Team – Affirmative Negative
Additional Comments
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Enter supporting content here